Improving Poll Worker Content on EAC's Website
Redesigning information architecture and content flow to improve clarity, usability, and poll worker sign-ups.
10 min read
2 months
Group project
UX researcher, UI designer
OptimalSort, Figma, Google suite, Zoom
SUS Score
88.6
27.6% increase post-implementation
Time reduced by
67%
t-test, p<0.001
Clicks reduced by
69%
t-test, p<0.001
Findings are based on a between-group A/B study with 30 participants - 15 per condition (see analysis section).

Discoverability
Make poll worker content easier to find and act on.

Minimalism
Reduce reliance on PDFs and external links.

Content Restructure
Improve IA to support recruitment and retention efforts.
"How can we reorganize the website’s information architecture to surface actionable, state-specific content in an intuitive, accessible format?"
Unstructured Content
The Problem
Poll worker content scattered across various sections of the site with no centralized hub, making it difficult for users to locate critical information or understand where to begin.
The Fix
Restructured the navigation by introducing a dedicated top-level section labeled “Become a Poll Worker”, consolidating all relevant content into a single, easily discoverable category.
No Clear Actionable Pathways
The Problem
Key actions like “Apply” are buried inside the Poll Worker Recruitment Lookup Tool, requiring users to navigate multiple layers.
The Fix
Simplified the task flow by putting “Check Eligibility” and “Apply” directly under the new “Become a Poll Worker” section, creating a clear, linear pathway for users to take action.
Content Buried in PDFs and External Links
The Problem
Crucial state-specific poll worker information was hidden inside downloadable PDFs or external redirects, creating unnecessary friction.
The Fix
Moved essential content from PDFs and third-party links into embedded web pages, making information easier to access without leaving the EAC site
Buried Poll Worker Lookup Tool
The Problem
The Poll Worker Recruitment Lookup Tool is embedded mid-page within dense content. Users must scroll to find a small dropdown menu labeled “Select State,” which is easy to overlook and visually disconnected from any clear call to action.
The Fix
Replaced the dropdown-based tool with a geo-personalized experience that automatically presents state-specific poll worker information on page load. Users can still manually change their location.
EAC website audit/crawling
Conducted using Sitebulb
Crawled 4,994 URLs
3,229 internal links, and 1,775 external links
Found 85 PDFs and docs
Alongside 16 redirecting URLs
Flagged many duplicate content
Related to "Apply", "Eligibility", and "Training"
Crawl depth visualization: majority of usable content was buried 3+ levels deep.
Unmoderated tree test
29 Participants
4 Tasks
T1
Check eligibility for poll work
T2
Apply for poll work
T3
Check election day responsibilities
T3
Find training materials
Pilot
50%
1st round
65%
2nd round
46%
Insight: Success improved in Round 1 due to clearer labeling and top-level placement of critical actions like Apply and Check Eligibility. However, Round 2 saw a drop in success after nesting those tasks under broader categories like Get Involved, introducing ambiguity and forcing users to backtrack.
Prioritize Content
Placement of high-priority actions (like Apply) higher up the content hierarchy consistently improved success.
Remove Ambiguity
Ambiguous category names like 'Get Involved' led to confusion and search fatigue.
Reduce Complexity
Overly nested paths reduced direct task success and increased user backtracking.
Language Matters
Avoiding keywords (like “training”) in task scenarios made them harder, especially in Round 2.
Main Navigation - Old Version
Main Navigation - New Version
A/B Test Analysis
Unmoderated remote usability test
30 Participants
4 Tasks
4 metrics tracked
T1
Check eligibility for poll work
T2
Apply for poll work
T3
Check election day responsibilities
T3
Find training materials
Across all four tasks, the improved navigation was on average 3.4× faster, with both time and click reductions consistently above 65%.
*These findings are based on 30 participants in a between-subjects study (15 per condition). The improved prototype included explicit task flows, which may have reduced distractions compared to the live site.

































